Musings from a variety of people from Delaware County, Pennsylvania.
12/27/2004
GIs can be forced to wear U.N. beret
GIs can be forced to wear U.N. beret
Federal judge upholds court martial of soldier who refused orders
Posted: December 25, 2004 1:00 a.m. Eastern
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42102
This is a total sham. The United States Military was created to defend the United States and her territories. PERIOD. The United Nations has no right to use our troops in any capacity or to dictate dress uniform code. Imagine being over in Mosul right now, not home with your family and friends. Young men and women who are bacially guards for oil. Being shot at 24/7 and hated by the civilian population! AND to have to wear a silly looking blue beret? My heart goes out to ALL of them. Here is the guy who was railroaded by our government for upholding his oath of alligence.
See Below.
''I, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God!"
Another thing that gets me rattled is what happened to the American Battle Star on Tanks, etc? Now they have this sideways triangle. What does it signify? The Abrams tank should have an AMERICAN star on it, like the ones used in WW2.
And finally this: Just WHO is protecting AMERICA proper right now? How many military personnel who are trained are in the states? Russia or China could invade us with the many troops they have and all we would have to try to stop them would be with what? Homeowner guns?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Ummmm, it's now been increased to a $350,000,000.00 contribution, that's $35,000,000.00 X 10.
ReplyDeleteWrong thread. Happy New Year to you too!
ReplyDeleteLast time i checked, I thought that the United States had agreed with the protocol that the UN had laid down. this means that a militia could be called up in order to protect the rights of soverign nations that are in dire need. The beret is a symbol of unity for a common goal, as is the slanted triangle on the Abrams and Bradleys.
ReplyDeleteAs for the issue of China or Russia invading, the idea is ludicris. First of all, Russia is in such shambles that they cant even afford to fuel thier Migs to fly for more than 10 minutes. as for the Chinese military, they only have a 3,000,000 force. and the majority of that is in thier airforce. And although they have a larger airforce than us, the technology gap between our two nations is tremendous. again, China is flying relics of the cold war that Russia sold off so that thier country wouldn't completely colapse. I'm sorry, but your arguement is completely unfounded.
Well then what about this?
ReplyDeleteChina's SSN 25
Both Russia and China have these weapons, and our aircraft carriers would be sitting ducks. Unfounded? You know as well as I that if martial law were inposed the "Bill of Rights" etc are null and void.
There are thousands of foriegn troops right here, right now in the U.S. It's only a matter of time, and time is running out.
That's my opinion anyway.